Inside this Article
Short on Time? These Are the Best AI Writers in 2022What We Look For in the Best AI WritersHow I Tested the Top AI Writers1. Copy.ai – The Most Impressive & Practical AI Writer I Tested2. Rytr – Affordable Multilingual Tool, But Content Can Lack Flow3. Jasper.ai – Works for Short Texts, But Tends to Sound GenericWhich AI Writers Are NOT Worth Your Time?Putting the Top AI Writers to UseFAQ
Short on Time? These Are the Best AI Writers in 2022
- Copy.ai – Hands down the best tool I tested, capable of generating impressively coherent content for various purposes, and has a free-forever plan.
- Rytr – Affordable and offers 30+ languages, but the content sometimes lacks logical flow.
- Jasper.ai – Works well for short texts, but tends to sound generic.
What We Look For in the Best AI Writers
There are a lot of things to consider when it comes to evaluating AI writers, but a few aspects stand out above the rest. These are the main things I evaluated in my research:
- Coherence: The text these tools generate needs to make sense and follow basic grammatical rules. I did overlook some odd and silly sentences, but too much nonsensical text was an immediate red flag.
- Originality: AI writers work by imitating content from other websites, but that doesn’t mean plagiarism or paraphrasing is acceptable. I checked each text using Copyscape to make sure it wasn’t clearly copied from another source.
- Customization options: The best AI writers give you several options for the type of text you want to create, the tone of voice, and other aspects. I noted the customization options for each tool and checked to see if they actually worked.
- Word limit: Some tools can only produce up to a certain number of words at a time, so they’re really only useful for certain types of content. I checked to see if each tool had a maximum word count.
- Additional features: Some AI writers offer extra features like templates and organization tools. I also tested these to figure out if they actually add value.
- Pricing: I researched the different subscription options for each tool and checked to see if they offer free versions.
How I Tested the Top AI WritersTo see if these AI writers could create decent content on various subjects, I used each one to generate at least three different blog posts. The general topics were cybersecurity, photo editing software, and loan refinancing. I created a basic title for each article, and plugged it into the AI writer in question to see its most basic capabilities. If the initial text was fairly well written, I also tested the other features that the tool offered. For example, in some cases I added keywords to make the article more specific or chose a different content type. I considered these results in my overall conclusions about each tool. Finally, I ran all of the AI-generated text through Copyscape, a tool that detects plagiarism by searching for identical text on the web. If it didn’t get any significant hits, it passed my final test. It’s worth mentioning that Copyscape isn’t perfect, so there’s a chance that it missed some things – but I trust that it would’ve picked up any major cases of plagiarism.
Of all the AI writers I included in my research, Copy.ai was by far the best. I was super impressed with the coherence of the text it generated; it actually sounded like it was written by a human! This tool isn’t without its flaws, but it could definitely be useful for generating content that doesn’t need to follow highly specific guidelines. Copy.ai offers several templates for different types of content. For my tests, I used the “Blog Post Wizard.” It allows you to input the title, keywords, and tone for your article, and then generates an outline. You can add or remove sections from this outline if you want. Next it creates a list of “talking points” for each section, which you can also edit before generating the final article. I found that if you don’t manually adjust the outline and talking points, the result isn’t very impressive. But with a bit of human interference, it can create a decent article. Once the article is generated, you can choose to regenerate the sections that aren’t up to your standards. This is a really useful feature, because it gives you the chance to redo the parts that aren’t working until you end up with something that makes sense. There are a few caveats: you can only regenerate whole sections (not individual sentences or paragraphs), and once you click “regenerate” you can’t restore the previous version. When I ran the finished articles through Copyscape, I only got a few very generic hits: phrases like “you’ll be able to” that probably have more to do with coincidence than plagiarism. Overall, Copy.ai definitely passed my originality test. The main downside of Copy.ai is that it doesn’t do great with more obscure topics. This is probably because it has less existing material to draw from – remember that no AI writer can actually create totally new content the way a human writer can. It would probably be most useful for more general topics that have already been covered extensively online.
|Input options||Title, keywords, tone|
|Customization options||Several templates, custom tones, Blog Wizard tool on Pro plan|
|Languages||25+ on Pro plan|
|Monthly limit||2,000 words on free plan / 40,000–300,000 on Pro plan (pricing based on word limits)|
|Price||Pro plan starts at $49 per month|
|Free version||Yes, plus a 7-day free trial of Pro plan|
Copy.ai Sample Text Adobe Photoshop is a software application used for image editing. It’s available for Windows, Mac and Linux operating systems, and there are many different versions depending on what you need to do with it. You can download it for free and use it for 30 days before deciding whether or not you want to keep using it; if so, then you’ll have to sign up for a monthly subscription through Adobe Creative Cloud (ACC).
2. Rytr – Affordable Multilingual Tool, But Content Can Lack Flow
The first thing that stood out to me about Rytr is the fact that it works in more than 30 languages. This is a huge advantage if you need to create multilingual content, as many AI writing tools are only available in English. That said, it’s only useful if the content itself is usable – and in terms of content quality, my tests had mixed results. I tested a few different “use cases” to see if Rytr was able to generate coherent text for different contexts, and with varying levels of input. The “Blog Idea and Outline” allowed me to specify one keyword and generate up to three variants. It then wrote a series of subheadings (not all of which made sense). I selected a few of these and asked it to write paragraphs for them. The writing itself was decent, but there wasn’t much flow between ideas. I also tried out “Blog Section Writing,” which allowed me to input a topic and keywords to generate a short section. Again, I was able to generate up to three variants for each section and then choose the best one. I also tried the “Video Description” and “Question and Answer” use cases, and the results were pretty much the same. I did notice some recurring issues with Rytr. Although it’s pretty good at writing standalone sentences, it’s not very good at creating logical transitions. It also tends to provide a lot of irrelevant background information and repetition. On top of that, sometimes it stops writing in the middle of a sentence – which is obviously not ideal. Since I was originally impressed by the variety of languages offered, I also decided to test it in Hebrew (which my coworker speaks natively). They told me it did pretty well, especially considering that this isn’t a very common language – although some parts of the text seemed like they had just been plugged into an automatic translation tool. Overall, Rytr isn’t as good as Copy.ai in terms of the quality of content. But it could definitely be useful in certain contexts. In addition to offering dozens of languages, it has a ton of customization and input options – and both of its paid plans are more affordable than Copy.ai’s Pro plan.
|Input options||Title, keywords, tone, use case, creativity level, language|
|Customization options||Custom use cases for specific types of text, built-in plagiarism checker|
|Languages||30+ on all plans, including the free version|
|Monthly limit||5,000 characters on free plan / 50,000 on Saver plan / no limit on Unlimited plan|
|Price||$9/month for the Saver plan, $29/month for the Unlimited plan|
|Free version||Yes, but very limited|
Rytr Sample Text Adobe Photoshop is a software that is used for photo editing and design. It has many features and can be used by both professionals and beginners. Adobe Photoshop has been around for a long time now. It was first released in 1990, but it has managed to stay up to date with all the latest technologies. This software is not only used for editing photos but also for designing websites, creating logos, and more.
3. Jasper.ai – Works for Short Texts, But Tends to Sound Generic
This is one of the most well-known AI writers on the market, so my expectations were pretty high. It didn’t quite live up to them – but I do see why Jasper.ai has gotten so much attention. It has a ton of customization options and allows you to input a lot of information. You can even give it a whole content brief or introduction. The main issue I ran into with Jasper.ai was that I could only get it to produce short texts – no more than 300 words at a time – even when using the “long-form” option. That said, the content itself was very smooth. I was impressed with the writing style, although it was admittedly a bit generic. If you only need to generate a few paragraphs at a time, it’s a pretty good option. Just like any AI writer, Jasper.ai does sometimes produce content that just doesn’t make sense. But I guess any automated tool is bound to write some nonsense eventually. This only reinforces why it’s so important to combine AI writing tools with human intervention, to ensure an acceptable level of quality.
|Input options||Title, 3 keywords, tone, description, content brief, introduction|
|Customization options||50+ templates, “recipes,” content improver tool, plagiarism checker and Grammarly integration on Boss Mode|
|Languages||25+ on both plans|
|Monthly limit||20,000 words on the Starter plan / 50,000 on Boss Mode|
|Price||$49/month for the Starter plan, $99/month for Boss Mode|
Jasper.ai Sample Text If you’re looking for an image editor that can do it all, Adobe Photoshop is your best bet. This software is packed with features that will let you create and edit photos like a pro. In this review, we’ll take a look at the top features of Photoshop, as well as the price and ease of use. We’ll also discuss customer service and what you can expect if you need help using the software.
Which AI Writers Are NOT Worth Your Time?
In my research, I only found one AI writing tool that I really wouldn’t recommend. It’s called AIWriter (very generic, I know), and I wasn’t impressed at all with the content it generated. It only allows you to input a title, and the text it churns out doesn’t make sense.
It seemed to me like AIWriter was just rewording sentences it found on the web, without any sense of logic. Granted, this is about what I expected when I set out to do this research. But I was pleasantly surprised to find that it is actually possible to use AI to write decent-quality content (as evidenced by the tools above) – so this one just didn’t measure up.
AIWriter Sample Text Many experts give it 5 stars rating and declared that it is the best software to edit images. Since its creation, Photoshop has been touted as one of the best photo editing apps, but now, it is available only through subscription services. It is been over thirty years since Photoshop started its journey of making incredible image transformations, and Photoshop is still one of the best photo editing apps that you can get for your money.
Putting the Top AI Writers to Use
First of all, it has to be said that AI writers can’t completely replace real live content writers and editors (at least not yet). But that doesn’t mean they can’t be useful – especially for people who work in the content industry, or businesses that need to create large amounts of content quickly and affordably.
AI writers are especially useful if you’re willing to hire an editor to polish the text. None of the tools I tested created content that I’d feel comfortable publishing without at least a good proofread. But Copy.ai could certainly be useful, especially in situations where quantity is more important than quality. Paying for a subscription would be cheaper than hiring freelance writers, and the results are on par with plenty of online content that’s written by actual people.
These are the main differences I found between the AI writing tools I tested:
|Free Plan||Best Feature||Best For||Starting Price|
|Copy.ai||✔||Generates the most coherent and natural content||Writing blog posts or articles on common topics||$49/month|
|Rytr||✔||Works in the most languages||Creating lots of content on a tight budget||$9/month|
|Jasper.ai||✘||Has a ton of customization and input options||Writing short-form content that doesn’t need to be specific||$49/month|